Hospital Snapshots 8

The last posts have considered the composition of the image and how much these asylum photographs may have had in common with mainstream portraits.  How also, sitters’ clothing, pose and surrounding objects might reveal something of their individuality.

It is important to stress that hospital records, whether written or visual, are not the last word on an individual, nor the most significant aspect of their life.  They record a tiny chapter and were not produced by or for the patient concerned, were not seen by them and were solely for the hospital’s use.  While it is impossible at this remove to accurately gauge the input patients may have had, they might have been able to exercise some autonomy over their photograph, albeit in a small way.

Not everyone chooses to meet us face to face.  Less than a quarter of the photographs, show the individual looking directly to camera, though it should be noted that this was very much in line with the conventions of the time.

Those who meet the camera’s, and by extension, our scrutiny do not always invite us to come closer.  Daniel McNaughton, who assassinated the Prime Minister’s private secretary in 1843, looks out squarely enough.  However, the lowered brows, untroubled gaze and slightly parted lips through which we can see the teeth, coupled with the folded arms and closed body language make us keep our distance.  The books on the table next to him appear incongruous; we are not convinced he has read them.

 photo DMsmall_zps9a0d0d43.jpg

Even those patients who are not looking at us directly or are deliberately looking away, can be no less revealing.

The case notes for Thomas Wilson, a non-conformist minister suffering from severe melancholia comment:  ‘The expression of his countenance is a good evidence of his mental wretchedness.’[1]

Sitting with slumped shoulders and loosely clasped hands, he seems entirely oblivious to the presence of anyone else.  He is not merely looking away but is disengaged from the whole process.  His eyes are open but not fully focused and we have the impression of someone fixed on something within.  His slightly unkempt hair and baggy suit add to a sense of distraction.

Looking at his photograph 150 years later, we too might make the same observation of ‘mental wretchedness’. Wilson, previously well respected by those he ministered to, later tried to commit suicide and, although unsuccessful, never recovered.  He was later transferred to an asylum nearer his native Norwich.

 photo TWWsmall_zps40d0ba33.jpg


[1] Bethlem case book 1858

UPDATE: If you want to help us to bring our photography collection into the 21st century then help us win the chance to work with acclaimed photographer, Rankin by voting here: http://bit.ly/voteBethlem.  We want to use this as a chance to show that you cannot tell if someone has a mental health issue by their appearance.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Hospital Snapshots 8”


  1. 1 Jackie Hopson July 4, 2013 at 11:34 am

    This series offers important additions to the stories of patients, with the added advantage of contemporary viewer being able to interpret portraits as another source of patient info.

  2. 3 Sue July 10, 2013 at 2:22 pm

    I couldn’t see the titles of the books, but why are they thought to look incongruous? Daniel McNaughton was a woodturner by trade but he had intellectual interests. Before he was detained he had belonged to a mechanics institute, a library and a debating society. He could read French and he wrote poetry. So perhaps he continued reading in Bethlem.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s